Thursday, July 31, 2008

Son of Det Garda McCabe Graduates



Son of Det Garda McCabe Among 300 Graduates
MARIE O'HALLORAN
Almost 300 new Garda recruits graduated at the Garda College in Templemore, Co Tipperary, today. The 201 men and 85 women were presented with their certificates by Minister for Defence Willie O’Dea at a ceremony.

Among the graduates was Garda Ross McCabe, son of Det Garda Jerry McCabe, who was shot dead during a post office raid in Adare, Co Limerick in 1996. Garda McCabe is to be stationed in Gurranabraher in Cork City.
Continue reading, click:

Vote Early, Vote Often

Ireland and the Lisbon Treaty
Vote Early, Vote Often
Jul 24th 2008 DUBLIN
From The Economist print edition

The French President Mollifies his Tone Towards Ireland

DAYS before his visit to Dublin on July 21st, Nicolas Sarkozy had alienated those he hoped to conciliate in his efforts to salvage the European Union’s Lisbon treaty. The Irish government was dismayed when the French president privately told party members, only four weeks after Ireland’s voters had decisively rejected Lisbon, that they would have to vote again. His leaked comments suggested that he would press his hosts into taking an early decision to hold a second referendum. It was the latest in a series of gaffes that have strained relations between the two governments, starting when the French foreign minister, Bernard Kouchner, warned the Irish that they would be the first victims if they said no to Lisbon.
Continue reading, click:

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Feedback From Readers #3

On the 'Audacity' of Family Matters & ILIR

So the brothers - in - law, O'Dowd and Staunton are at it again. I gave up reading the Irish Voice years ago. Only the gullible would take it seriously. These ILIR people live in their own little world removed from the rest of us. There is more credibility in the National Inquirer.
AOH Officer Rockland County


Pat, a chara,


Wonder who the source of the story was. Hard to imagine someone making an error like that about their own brother-in-law!
Veteran Irish Northern Aid Activist, Bronx, New York



Patrick:

Well written.
As you have emphasized over these last few years, the issue is so sensitive the current environment requires that rectifying Irish immigration difficulties be done through quiet discrete diplomatic lobbying and not through the anarchistic, boisterous, leftie hysterics to which we have been treated by ILIR. However, as you imply there is no money to be made or profiles to be burnished from "quiet, discrete, diplomatic lobbying".
Irish American legal eagle, Westchester County, N.Y.


Hurley:

Deport all illegals, Irish included! And as for you, you should be shipped back in irons to count sheep in New Zealand! Only joking! Legalize the Irish and overturn Teddy Kennedy's law. Blast the Kennedys, anyway! As for ILIR, O'Dowd, Staunton and company, as they'd say on the other side, you have them sussed!
Irish American Kerryman, Queens


On Jack Meehan


Patrick,
I, too, was very offended by the two columns in the Irish Voice by the way they disrespected Jack Meehan. Jack is an expert on Immigration and a staunch supporter of my friend Malachy McAllister. Thanks for standing up for Jack.
Regards,
AOH Officer, Nassau County, N.Y.


I have had the personal experience of knowing President Jack Meehan for many years. I consider him a very close friend. I have known him since he became a member of Division 14, Watertown, sponsored by another Past National President, Jack Connolly. I have watched Jack, as he became more and more involved with this organization, which he admires and loves. To me his service and devotion are unmatched and they are most sincere. I do hope that others will see and recognize what Jack is and who he is, a truly devoted figure to represent us all. Slainte,
AOH Member, Boston



On Daniel O'Donnell . . . er. . . O'Connell

Hi Pat:

Really enjoy the blog. Looked at the Google ''REBEL SECTION'' ADVERT. JUST LOVED THAT. NOTED ONE HILARIOUS ITEM, A PICTURE OF THE LIBERATOR DANIEL O'CONNELL. BY MISTAKE THEY ARE SELLING IT UNDER THE NAME, GET THIS, DANIEL O'DONNELL. THE DONEGAL DUDE IS REALLY TOO GENTLE TO BE COMPARED TO O'CONNELL. HOPE YOUR ALL HAVING A NICE SUMMER. - 1980s Roscommon Immigrant, Queens, N.Y.




On Sinn Fein's Refusal to Fly the Tricolor in Dungiven

FRANCIE BROLLY HANG YOUR HEAD IN DISGRACE!

How must the Lynch family feel? How must the families of all the Hunger Strikers feel? This speaks volumes! How can they talk about "a united Ireland in 2016", yet they oppose hanging a tricolour? Give us a break!

After 30+ years of attending protests, visiting Republican Prisoners, watching the 1981 Hunger Strikers suffer and die, knowing how their families suffered..........this is mystifying !!!??? (Well, not really I guess... but some how it still is!)

After all that was done for Francie Brolly and his family by supporters in New York; what could change a man's values and principles ?!?! ( Where have all their principles gone? And what do they stand for ?)

Francie Brolly should hang his head is shame! He is a disgrace to all things Irish & Catholic and all things Irish Republican! Our families having been good friends for decades.... I would cross to the other side of the street if I saw him today. It just goes to show how money, power, and position can corrupt a persons' values. 30 years ago I never thought Francie Brolly would become a sell-out and an anglophile!

GOD SAVE IRELAND! This is my daily prayer.


Veteran Irish Republican Activist, Bronx, New York

Breast Cancer: Urgent Action Required

From a nurse:
"I'll never forget the look in my patients' eyes when I had to tell them they had to go home with the drains, new exercises and no breast. I remember begging the Doctors to keep these women in the hospital longer, only to hear that they would, but their hands were tied by the insurance companies. So there I sat with my patients, giving them the instructions they needed to take care of themselves, knowing full well they didn't grasp half of what I was saying, because the glazed, hopeless, frightened look spoke louder than the quiet 'Thank You' they muttered.
A mastectomy is when a woman's breast is removed in order to remove cancerous breast cells/tissue. If you know anyone who has had a mastectomy, you may know that there is a lot of discomfort and pain afterwards. Insurance companies are trying to make mastectomies an outpatient procedure. Let's give women the chance to recover properly in the hospital for 2 days after surgery.
It takes 2 seconds to help these women and this is very important. Please take the time and do it! Please send this to everyone in your address book. If there was ever a time when our voices and choices should be heard, this is one of those times. If you're receiving this, it's because I think you will take the 30 seconds to vote on this issue and send it on to others you know who will do the same.
There's a bill called the Breast Cancer Patient Protection Act, which will require insurance companies to cover a minimum 48-hour hospital stay for patients undergoing a mastectomy. It's about eliminating the 'drive-through' Mastectomy, where women are forced to go home just a few hours after surgery, against the wishes of their doctor, still groggy from anesthesia and sometimes with drainage tubes still attached. Lifetime Television has put this bill on their web page with a petition drive to show support. Last year over half the House of Representatives signed on.
PLEASE!! Sign the petition by clicking on the web site below. You need not give more than your name, state, and zip code: (http://www.lifetimetv.com/breastcancer/petition/signpetition.php )
This takes about 2 seconds. PLEASE PASS THIS ON to your friends and family, and on behalf of all women, THANKS."

Irish Dole Numbers Dramatic Increase

Number Signing On Live Register Rises by 10,600
DAVID LABANYI

The rise in the number of people claiming unemployment benefits over the last year has increased at the fastest rate since records began over 40 years ago. In July, 10,600 people joined the Live Register bringing the seasonally adjusted total signing on to 226,000, on a seasonally adjusted basis, according to figures released by the Central Statistics Office this morning.
The monthly increase is the second highest on record after March of this year. The number on the register is the highest in a decade. Last month’s increase lifted the standardised unemployment rate to 5.9 per cent, the CSO said. Over the last 12 months the number of people seeking unemployment benefits has risen by over a third with 63,647 people joining the register. In July 6,700 males and 3,800 females joined the register.
Continue reading, click:

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

AOH Election Results

Congrats & Best Wishes
to the
New AOH National Board
Ar Aghaidh Leo!

Ancient Order of Hibernians
National Board Election
Saturday July 26, 2008
At the 94th Biennial Convention in New Orleans LA

President - Seamus Boyle (PA)
Vice President - Brendan Moore (NY)
Secretary - Thomas McNabb (NY)
Treasurer- Judge James McKay (LA)
Elected Directors
Joseph Brady (RI); Frank Kearney (CT); Keith Carney (DC); Danny O'Connell (OH); Martin Kelly (NY); Chris Norris (PA)
Appointed to Financial Oversight Committee
Past National Presidents, George Clough (MO); Joseph Roche (MD); Nicholas Murphy (NY);
Appointed National Chaplain
Father Patrick Sullivan C.S.C.
Hibernian Charity Board
President Ned McGinley (PA) - Elected 2007 (two year term)
Secretary Frank Kearney Jr (CT) - Elected 2007 (three year term)
Treasurer Edward J. Wallace (NY) - Elected 2007 (two year term)
Board of Directors (Elected to 2 year term at the 2008 Convention)
Joseph Brady (RI); Robert Mott (SC); Phillip Gallagher (CT); Edward Dougherty (PA)

Monday, July 28, 2008

Irish Say No To 2nd Lisbon Referendum

Mick Fealty


Monday, July 28, 2008, 05:37 PM GMT [
General]

The Irish Foreign Minister,
Micheál Martin, is not happy. A survey carried out by leading Irish pollster Red C Research has discovered that a massive 71 per cent of those polled do not want to vote in a second referendum. The sample was of just over 1000 respondents (Mori considers 1,000 sufficient to replicate the results from higher samples).

The EurActive site
extrapolates the figures for the poll into a future referendum and concludes that: The new figures would mean that, compared to the first run on 12 June, where 53.4 per cent of the Irish rejected the text the no camp could further increase its lead by 6 percentage points to a commanding 24-point lead in a rerun.

But the reason the Minister gives for being so unhappy is that it was commissioned by the London based Eurosceptic think tank,
Open Europe. He considers it a meddling exercise in Irish internal affairs: "I would like to know what prompted a British organisation with a strong ideological bias to commission a poll into Irish attitudes to Europe at this time. Ireland's future in Europe is a matter for decision by Irish people."

A fair enough point so far as it goes, especially given the troubled history between the two countries. Except, as Lorraine Mullally of Open Europe tells Brassneck: "How is it interfering to ask people how they might vote in a future re-run referendum? It's not as though it hasn't happened before, look at Nice? It's clear that people don't want a referendum. The truth is the government is panicking, since it's strategy of taking the country back to the polls is in trouble".

There have been accusations from
Dick Roche, the Minister of State for European Affairs, that the questions were 'extraordinarily skewed' on Newstalk yesterday morning. That is, perhaps, a line the Minister would be well advised not to pursue too rigourously.

In the immediate wake of the referendum, my Brassneck colleague Richard asked
why had there been no official exit poll from the national broadcaster RTE? He also picked up on a mystery at the time: ie, the selective leaking of the results of a EuroBarometer poll to certain papers days before the actual results were released: But much, much worse is this selective leaking of information from an unpublished poll, supposedly a flash Eurobarometer survey. That selective leaking is driving debate, and is going to further increase distrust in politicians - in Dublin and Brussels - based on confusion.

The poll should have been published properly, on the EU website, so that it could have been interrogated properly by lots of different people. What was the methodology? What research company was used? Where were they based? What were the questions? What are the demographic cross-tabs? Who actually commissioned it? Were there unprompted response questions? Did interviewers probe further on responses like "I didn't understand the treaty"?
In the end, there was, as
Open Europe reports on it its own blog, some serious discrepancies in detail between these briefings and the actual results when they were finally came out:
The Times
story on 18 June ran with the headline "Irish voters failed to understand the Lisbon Treaty", citing a figure from the EU Commission stating that, amongst No voters, "40 per cent blamed the fact that they did not understand the treaty."

By then of course, the selective briefing had already driven and given shape to the national debate. It looks like a serious attempt, by the European Commission/Irish government to skew the terms on which that debate took place. This latest poll seems purer than the driven snow by comparison. And
it is already beginning to make itself felt on the super coalition of government and opposition.

This is likely to continue to be a multilateral battle of wills, with British Eurosceptics, French centralists, and an Irish government unused to being 'called' on it own strategic mores battling for significant mind share of the Irish people.

- Mick Fealty

An Irish Ramsey Clark

Forwarded by Irish American GOP Leader, Virginia
This is the same little pencil neck left wing twit that . . . misinformed Irish American groups got in bed with to challenge the Extradition Treaty. He is an Irish Ramsey Clark.

US lawyer Seeks to Sue US Over Iran Threats
With lawyers like this in the US, who needs Hizbollah proxies? Plenty of lawyers defending al-qaeda, Hamas and Hizbollah, who’s defending the American people? Pre-empting pre-emptive attacks aka legal jihad. An American lawyer has offered to represent Iran in an international lawsuit against Israel and his own government in an effort to stop Washington and Tel Aviv from initiating further sanctions against Tehran.


Francis A. Boyle says following Washington’s latest ultimatum to Tehran to freeze uranium enrichment within two weeks or face further isolation, Iran needs to act quickly. At weekend talks in Geneva, the United States delivered what it describes as a “clear and simple message” that Iran must choose between cooperation or confrontation. In an email interview with Press TV, Boyle urged Iran to begin drafting lawsuits for presentation to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague before the two-week ultimatum expires.


Q. Precisely what would the charges against the US and Israel be? What are you hoping to achieve?
A. About two years ago Iran contacted me about a proposal I had made to sue the United States, Israel and the EU-3 (Britain, France and Germany) at the International Court of Justice in The Hague for their repeated and public threats to launch a military attack upon Iran over its undoubted right under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to engage in nuclear reprocessing.
My proposal was that Iran should sue these states immediately, convene an Emergency Hearing by the World Court, and ask the Court to indicate provisional measures of protection on behalf of Iran against the United States, Israel and the EU-3 — basically a temporary restraining order.
I felt that these lawsuits would be able to prevent a military attack against Iran and also prevent the imposition of sanctions against Iran by the United Nations Security Council. In addition, by Iran submitting this entire matter to the World Court, it would make it clear to the entire world who the real culprits are here.
The threat and use of military force clearly violates Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter. The Charter also mandates the peaceful resolution of international disputes. By filing these lawsuits Iran would prove to the entire world that it intends to resolve this matter peacefully and in accordance with international law.
I notice that just this week Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei publicly stated that he would sue the United States if it attacked Iran. I am proposing that we sue the United States immediately in order to prevent any attack upon or blockade of Iran, which would be an act of war.

Q. Why are you seeing to bring this action in an international court, rather than a domestic US court?


A. This would be a total waste of time. Based upon my prior experience, there is no way a United States court would rule against the United States government on a matter like this.

Q. You are proposing to represent Iran in a court action against the US and Israel - what are you seeking from Tehran - what mandate would they need to give you. Basically, how would this work?


A. Of course if Iran wants me to represent Iran in these lawsuits I would be happy to do so. But given the fact that I am a US national, Iran might prefer to have its own lawyers file these lawsuits. Iran already has a detailed Memorandum of Law from me on these lawsuits. The Iranian lawyers can simply use my Memorandum as they see fit. I would be happy to assist them in whatever way they desire.


Q. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has been in the news recently regarding a prosecution against Sudan’s leader, Omar al-Bashir. Explain the difference between the ICJ and the ICC.


A. The International Court of Justice deals with disputes between states, which the nuclear reprocessing dispute is all about. The International Criminal Court deals with the personal criminal responsibility of individuals. It has no authority to rule upon or settle disputes between states, which the ICJ can do.


Q. The US does not recognize the jurisdiction of the ICC - what is its relationship with the ICJ?


A. The ICJ would have jurisdiction to hear lawsuits by Iran against the United States, Israel and the EU-3 irrespective of the ICC.


Q. Israel regularly disregards international court verdicts and UN resolutions (the Separation Wall, settlement expansion etc.) What makes you believe there is value in another court action?


A. Israel has never been sued at the International Court of Justice — the Wall was only an Advisory Opinion. By suing the United States and Israel together, Iran would make it very clear to the entire world what is really going on here by putting them in cahoots together. As of now the EU-3 are no longer threatening Iran with military force, so I would hold off from suing them at this time. But if they threaten Iran with military force, or support the United States and Israel with their threats, then of course they should be sued too.


Q. Assuming a mandate or commission is given by Tehran for you to represent them, what sort of timeline are we looking at before this goes before a judge, and then a verdict?


A. Based upon my prior experience at the World Court, it would take a few days to put the papers together and file them. We could get an Emergency Hearing by the Court within 2 weeks and an Order of Provisional Measures of Protection on behalf of Iran — a temporary restraining order against the US and Israel — within a week thereafter.
I filed the World Court lawsuit for Bosnia against Serbia over genocide on March 19, 1993, had the emergency hearing by the Court on April 1-2, and won the Order for Bosnia on 8 April 1993.
Given the inconclusive results at weekend talks in Geneva and the decision that Iran will be given another two weeks for its final answer, I respectfully submit that Iran should start moving on this process now. The Wall Street Journal has already reported moves for more unilateral, multilateral, and Security Council sanctions against Iran, including a blockade of Iran, which would be an act of war.
At a minimum, Iran should draft the Court documents now, then see what happens after Iran presents its “final offer” in two weeks.


Q. If you achieve positive verdict, how would you expect the verdict to be worded? Are there any sanctions against a state that does not abide by the ruling?


A. I would ask for Iran to be protected from a military attack by the United States and Israel in the most comprehensive language possible, including a blockade of Iran by the United States, a termination of all threats and use of military force, and of all measures of political, diplomatic and economic coercion against Iran.
The Order would go to the Security Council for enforcement.
If the US should exercise its veto, then we could try to take it to the United Nations General Assembly under the Uniting for Peace Resolution, where we would only need a two-thirds vote. In any event, this World Court Order would make it clear to the entire world who is right and who is wrong in this dispute.


Q. You have commented on the levels of rhetoric, what influence could this have on any court action?


A. I fully stand for a peaceful resolution of this dispute by means of diplomacy. But if the United States will not engage in good faith negotiations with Iran, then their and Israel’s escalating threat and use of military force against Iran will only make it easier for me to win an Order from the World Court protecting Iran from the United States and Israel and, if necessary, the EU-3


Q. Another timeline question. Assuming this court action is aimed at preventing armed conflict, how urgent is it to commence the proceedings?


A. Apparently, according to CNN today, Iran has two weeks to prepare its final answer. That would be enough time to prepare all these documents. If the talks break down after Iran submits its “final offer,” then we could immediately file the lawsuits, ask for an Emergency Hearing by the World Court, and request the Orders protecting Iran.
Back in early 1992, President Bush Snr. had the Sixth Fleet on military maneuvers off the coast of Libya planning for an attack and had US jet fighters penetrating Libyan airspace to provoke an attack over the Lockerbie matter.
We filed similar papers with the World Court on behalf of Libya against the United States and the United Kingdom, asking for an Emergency Hearing by the Court. President Bush Snr. then ordered the Sixth Fleet to stand down. There was no military attack against Libya then or later. Those World Court lawsuits eventually led to a peaceful resolution of the Lockerbie dispute between Libya, the United States and the United Kingdom, which now have normal diplomatic relations. Hopefully the same can be done here by means of these World Court lawsuits.


Q. During an appearance on Press TV’s Middle East Today program in April this year you requested backing from Tehran for a court action against Israel on charges of genocide against Israel. Has there been any movement, any response? What is the current status?


A. This proposal is currently pending in the Office of President Ahmadinejad. The suffering of the Palestinians constitutes genocide. I am still willing to file that lawsuit if the President so desires. But given the urgency of the situation, and the threat of a terrible war, it might be best to get these nuclear-related lawsuits against the United States and Israel underway at this time, then act to protect the Palestinians from Israel later. Of course all this is for President Ahmadinejad to decide, not me.


Q. You successfully sued Serbia - but in the political atmosphere at the time, Serbia was widely perceived as the “bad guy” and frankly, the pro-Serbia lobby in the United States is insignificant. These cases are rather different, given popular support for Israel in the US. You will be representing what is widely regarded in the US as an unpopular or even hostile government against your own country and Washington’s main ally in the Middle East.
How concerned are you regarding your professional reputation at home? Potentially, how damaging could this be for you - even with a successful outcome?


A. Back in 2004, the FBI/CIA put me on all the US government’s so-called “terrorist watch lists” because I refused to become an informant for them on my Arab and Muslim clients, which would have violated their rights under the US Constitution and my ethical obligations as an attorney.
So I am sure there will be further repercussions. But under no circumstance do I want to see a war between Iran and the United States, which could readily degenerate into World War III.
With all due respect to Iran’s leaders, they must not underestimate the ruthlessness and cruelty of President Bush and Vice President Cheney, and their Straussian Neo-Conservative advisors when it comes to their willingness to use military force against Iran.
We must do everything in our power to prevent a war and obtain a peaceful resolution of this dispute over nuclear reprocessing that in my opinion can be resolved satisfactorily. These World Court lawsuits will contribute towards a peaceful resolution of this dispute between Iran and the United States, which will then order Israel to stand down.

(Source)
Tags:
, , , , , , , ,
This entry was posted on July 25, 2008 at 9:44 and is filed under Creeping Sharia, Legal, Middle East, News, Politics, Sharia, military.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Sinn Fein Opposes Flying of Tricolor

Sinn Fein Opposes Flying of Tricolor
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/foyle_and_west/7525008.stm
Sinn Fein Man Opposes Flag Flying

Francie Brolly suggested bunting would be more appropriate
A Sinn Fein assembly member has said he is not happy that Irish tricolours are being flown from lamp posts in Dungiven to commemorate a dead hunger striker.
Sunday is the anniversary of the death of Kevin Lynch, who died during the 1981 hunger strikes. The main street has been lined with flags but MLA Francie Brolly said an alternative tribute should be used. "I have strong feelings about the tricolour, perhaps bunting would be more appropriate for the parade route."

A man who helped organise Sunday's commemoration, but did not wish to be named, said he had never heard of any problems with flags being flown in Dungiven before.
"This happens every year and I've never heard any complaints about this before," he said.



FRANCIE BROLLY HANG YOUR HEAD IN DISGRACE!

How must the Lynch family feel? How must the families of all the Hunger Strikers feel? This speaks volumes! How can they talk about "a united Ireland in 2016", yet they oppose hanging a tricolour? Give us a break!

After 30+ years of attending protests, visiting Republican Prisoners, watching the 1981 Hunger Strikers suffer and die, knowing how their families suffered..........this is mystifying !!!??? (Well, not really I guess... but some how it still is!)

After all that was done for Francie Brolly and his family by supporters in New York; what could change a man's values and principles ?!?! ( Where have all their principles gone? And what do they stand for ?)

Francie Brolly should hang his head is shame! He is a disgrace to all things Irish & Catholic and all things Irish Republican! Our families having been good friends for decades.... I would cross to the other side of the street if I saw him today. It just goes to show how money, power, and position can corrupt a persons' values. 30 years agoI never thought Francie Brolly would become a sell-out and an anglophile!

GOD SAVE IRELAND! This is my daily prayer.

Veteran Irish Republican Activist, Bronx, New York

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Irlandais - Vous Avez Trois Minuits



Sarkozy: Three minutes is all I can manage.

Cowen: Poor Carla

Poor Diarmada, Definitely Cracking Down

Renewal of Border Checks With Britain Proposed
CIARA O'BRIEN

The first formal border checks between Ireland and Britain in more than 80 years were proposed by the two governments today. The governments have agreed a range of measures to check the identity of travellers, both at a national level and joint initiatives, to strengthen the Common Travel Area, the passport-free zone set up in 1925 following Irish independence.

In a joint statement with the British home secretary, Jacqui Smith, the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Dermot Ahern said it was crucial that the countries worked together to ensure the strength of the borders.

However, they said that the proposed measures recognised the particular circumstances of Northern Ireland. "Both Governments reaffirm that they have no plans to introduce fixed controls on either side of the Irish land border for immigration or other purposes," he said.
However, Mr Ahern said state of the art border technology, joint sea and port operations, and the exchange of intelligence would be used. This would include electronic border management systems to count people arriving and leaving the country, and identify "people who may be of interest to our law enforcement authorities".
Border Security for Me . . . But Not for Thee
Note: As Irish foreign affairs minister, Dermot Ahern lobbied to frustrate the enhancement of U.S. border and interior security, and immigration controls. - Patrick H.

Latest From Libertas

The Latest from Libertas
Ganley tells Sarkozy that the Lisbon Treaty is dead
Monday, 21 July 2008

Chairman of Libertas, Declan Ganley, at a private group meeting with President of France and European Council Nicholas Sarkozy said that the Treaty of Lisbon is dead. "During the meeting, President Sarkozy himself twice admitted that his own people would vote no to the Lisbon Treaty, as they have already rejected a very similar text in the guise of the failed EU Constitution. For President Sarkozy to come here and assemble a meeting of the successful no side and defeated yes side to discuss the treaty seems to suggest the people voted yes, this is a complete disregard for democracy.
Last month the people of Ireland voted no, and their vote must be respected. President Sarkozy listened to what everyone had to say - however whilst he says he respects the Irish vote - further assurances are needed that this is the case. During the discussion, President Sarkozy acknowledged that the European elections may become the focus of a debate about the future of Europe and the Lisbon Treaty. The people of all the other 26 European member states are entitled to their say on this text. President Sarkozy did respond to my comments by saying he had an idea and he then went on to say that he would like to come back to Ireland for a longer visit, or meet with some of the parties in Paris. I don't know whether or not this will be followed up.
If Europe is to have a new treaty/Constitution, it should be short and understandable, the aim should be 20 or 25 pages, it should be upfront and honest about what it seeks to achieve and all Europe's citizens must get a vote on it. We need a strong, respected and credible Europe and the only way to achieve that is by ensuring that if we confer more power on Brussels, those exercising that power need to be accountable at a ballot box and present themselves before the electorate to seek a mandate, just as he did when he was elected President of France.
The most worrying thing about this meeting is the fact that clearly the message is not being heard, perhaps not even being heard at all, and that's what makes the meeting somewhat pointless. We have said no. Libertas is still unsure if that democratic vote will be respected by the elites in Brussels, or Paris. The future of Europe needs to be based on the principles of democracy for all its citizens, and in the only referendum on this treaty, the people asked said no. Brussels needs to take account of this, listen to the people of Ireland and all of Europe, and ensure that what happens next fully respects the principles of democracy that we Irish fought so hard for.
I look forward to a future exchange with President Sarkozy on this issue.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

De Cork Boy's Perspective # 2

De Cork Boy’s Perspective

Oh, The Audacity!

By Patrick Hurley

The national leadership of the Ancient Order of Hibernians (AOH) was recently astounded to learn that their 2008 national convention, set for New Orleans in late July, was being planned and organized in the "Intelligencer" column of the Irish Voice. I know, I know, I know! "Intelligence", or any derivative of the word, is not what one typically juxtaposes in one’s mind with the anti – American, leftist weekly. However, within said propaganda sheet, it was announced with great fanfare that ILIR vice chairman and Sinn Fein representative, Ciaran Staunton would be the key - note speaker at the convention. The only problem was that no one thought to inform the AOH national leadership or the convention organizers.

As a result of the Voice’s self - generated "scoop", the AOH has now been put in a very embarrassing position. The Order had received requests from many different entities to speak on a range of subjects, including immigration, but time being no man’s friend, it was circumscribed in the number of speakers it could accommodate. Apparently, ILIR did contact the convention organizers, hours before the Voice’s deadline, requesting speaking time but was told that as minutes were precious, and the roster of speakers was choc – a - bloc, it would be very difficult, if not impossible, to accommodate it.

In addition to being the largest Irish American organization - although in recent years ILIR has incredibly laid claim to that mantle! - the AOH is, of course, a Catholic, feverently patriotic, pro American, traditionalist organization. Accordingly, over the years, it and the values it represents, has been the subject of countless hysterical, irrational attacks by the Irish Voice. So, aside from the actual difficulty of obtaining said publication of ever decreasing circulation - apparently the illusory 50,000 undocumented Irish are not subscribing - you will appreciate that obtaining a weekly copy is hardly a priority for most AOH members.

Thus, it took an E mail from one of the AOH’s New York leaders to alert the national leadership to the fact that the Voice/ILIR had taken it upon itself to reorganize the New Orleans convention. This AOH honcho was particularly miffed at the way the "Intelligencer" article endeavored to dismiss the essential role that the order, and, in particular, National President Jack Meehan, had played in the successful immigration reform campaign of the 1980s.

According to the column authored by Staunton’s brother - in - law, Niall O’Dowd, Ciaran’s appearance at the convention would be the first time "that the conference will hear from a speaker on behalf of the undocumented" and represents a major "break through for the AOH". The implication, of course, being that the AOH has been AWOL over the decades in the endeavor to resolve the Ted Kennedy manufactured Irish immigration predicament. And so to the E Mail:


"Gentlemen:


"I have attached a piece from today’s Irish Voice that incorrectly claims that Ciaran Staunton will be the first time a representative of the undocumented Irish will speak at our convention. It states his appearance is a 'major breakthrough in itself'.

Jack Irwin, former AOH National Immigration Chairman and Pat Hurley, Div 3 NY County, both leaders of the Irish Immigration Reform Movement, spoke at our 1988 National Convention. At that convention, a resolution was passed to support the IIRM’s efforts, according to author, Linda Dowling Almeida on pgs. 72-75 of Irish Immigrants in New York City, 1945-1995.

Representative members of the IIRM, EIIC, IIC and other Irish immigration organizations have continuously worked with our Order and have continued to speak to our state and national conventions thereafter.

I don’t need to remind you that our National President, and I, remain active in our undocumented communities through work in the EIIC, IIC and other Coalition of Irish Immigration Center member organizations. Through the executive officers and immigration chairs, both State and National, this Order continues to keep immigration a high priority at all times.

This piece rings back to the past revisionist tactics employed by this paper to diminish our Order’s good work. Perhaps a strong reminder of factual history and current events would benefit the Irish Voice’s editorial staff."

The 1965 Immigration Act had not even been enacted when the United Irish American Immigration Committee, a derivative of the AOH, was alerting all who would listen of the potential adverse consequences for legal Irish immigration. As a result of their efforts, Irish American politicians, like Tip O’Neill, dependent on their receiving a green light from the then Irish Government, were prepared to insert a clause into the legislation, which would have protected Irish interests. However, as O’Neill related in his auto biography Man of The House, the phone call from the Irish Embassy never came.

The United Irish American Immigration Committee would continue its lonely valiant efforts, well into the 1980s, to redress the discriminatory effects of the 1965 Act. The challenge would then be assumed by the IIRM and, subsequently, a reconstituted National AOH Immigration Committee.

From the early Sixties to the early Eighties, Ireland was experiencing Celtic Tiger #1 - yes, we have been there before! – and successive Irish governments of the era encouraged the notion that Ireland would never again see a poor day and that the specter of emigration would never again hover o’er the land. It seems that visionaries like Donagh O’Malley were more the exception than the rule. In the 1980s, thousands of young Irish would pay the penalty for that vision less buffoonery. They would squander the potential of their youth as illegal aliens because of the phone call that was never made. Are the nepotistic political dynasties of Andrews, Barrys, Coughlans, Deasys, Haugheys, Lenihans, O’Malleys, Ryans, etc., who run Ireland, capable of any vision? Do they have any concept of Ireland’s true place in the world? Or, is Ireland condemned to continually repeat the mistakes of the past?

The IIRM was the fuse that launched the immigration reform campaign of the 1980s, but without the essential contribution of the AOH legislative victory would not have been achievable. Of course, that was the pre 9/11 world and the dynamics were totally different.

Both National President Meehan and the AOH NYS President Matt Neligan have articulated that the Order will only advocate for legislation that advances U.S. cultural, economic, intellectual and security interests in the context of which, a resolution can be found for the Irish problem. The AOH’s refusal to support ILIR, the Celtic Tiger Government, and extreme leftist groups like La Raza and ANSWER, in the furtherance of their anti - American, massive amnesty agenda by no means equates to the Order being absent in the immigration fight. In any case, the Dublin establishment, its surrogate ILIR, or, indeed, any element of the U.S.-bashing Irish Left, do not define the Irish American agenda. That is the prerogative of, well . . . Irish Americans. Indeed, the radical, riotous campaign pursued by ILIR, Dublin and their leftist allies has done serious damage to the cause of resolving the Irish immigration problem. At the very least, it has probably set any resolution back by several years. Recent comments made by Taoiseach Brian Cowen indicate that reality may be slowly dawning in Dublin. But, the word from the Hill is that it is probably too little, too late.

The United Irish American Immigration Committee, the AOH Immigration Committee, and the IIRM never championed an anti - American, leftist philosophy. Nor, indeed did they ever reduce the immigration fight to a mere gravy train of self promotion and commerical enhancement.

ILIR, and all its trappings, is an illusion fabricated by a collaboration of Sinn Fein and the Dublin 4/Iveagh House establishment, united around their shared anti-Americanism. Vice Chairman Staunton, as well as wearing his ILIR and Sinn Fein hats, is also, as mentioned above, the brother – in - law of Irish Voice publisher, Niall O’Dowd. O’Dowd, of course, is frequently referred to in stories - of the utmost objectivity and carefully researched fact, of course - on the pages of his own publication as the "Chairman" of ILIR. And in fairness, he does, when convenient, don that chapeau of opportunity.

The "executive director" of ILIR, Kelly Fincham (was/is???) an Irish Voice employee. And yet another key executive member may also punch an Irish Voice time card. Indeed, it is hard to know where the Irish Voice ends and ILIR begins, or vice versa. As a Glenflesk man said to me recently, "The corporate governance scholars would have their work cut out sorting out that tangled web." By the way, anybody keeping count of the number of journalistic canons that have been violated, thus far? Words like accountability, conflict of interest, transparency, etc. invade our stream of consciousness. All the more so, considering that empirically at least one of the main beneficiaries of the largesse which has flown into ILIR’s coffers, has been well . . . the Irish Voice!

We recall, back in the 1980s when there really was an immigration crisis, as a member of a group of exhausted, overwhelmed zealots operating on a shoestring budget AKA the IIRM - that "quasi terrorist" organization, which was held at arms - length by the Dublin establishment - being constantly harried by O’Dowd’s arrogant pompous editorials and "Frank Barry" columns demanding accountability, transparency and, specifically, audited accounts of the disbursement of IIRM funds – often monies we took from our own pockets. And, you know what – you’d better sit down gentle reader - although his motives were questionable, O’Dowd was right. Any organization soliciting financial contributions from the Irish American community, or, indeed, receiving Irish tax payer funds owes a frequent public audited accounting of disbursements.

Although, it was onerous at the time, the IIRM did produce audited accounts. The "Movement" had nothing to hide. At the end of the campaign, individual members, after years of personal sacrifice may have been richer in the intellectual, moral and spiritual sense but were certainly not so financially.

Doesn’t ILIR owe the same accounting? Doesn’t it owe an explanation to the community as to how, say, that next battery of full page adverts will advance its purported goal of legalizing the Irish. And what of the largesse from the Celtic Tiger Government? As we were told so often back when there really was an immigration crisis , the Irish Government, as a foreign government cannot allow its money or resources to be be used for lobbying. But, perhaps the situation has changed and those restrictions no longer apply. However, don’t the taxpayers of the Celtic Tiger have a right to know how their hard - earned tax Euros are being expended? And shouldn’t we Irish Americans, as U.S. Citizens, be confident that Irish tax payers’ money is not being used to advocate legislation and policy, which would severely degrade the standard of living of the hardworking, tax - oppressed middle class and, which would emasculate the economy and security of the nation that adopted us and of the homeland of our children and grandchildren ?

But we digress. Fodder for another day!

The word now is that in the spirit of magnanimity and in keeping with "Friendship, Unity and Christian Charity", the AOH will now endeavor to squeeze Vice - Chairman Staunton into their choc – a - bloc program, possibly two or three minutes at an off- line working committee. Believe me, after all the mean – spirited, hysterical, irrational Irish Voice attacks on the Order over the years, that is definitely "Christian Charity". They’re better men than we!

Patrick Hurley is a past president of the County Cork Association of New York. In 1987, Hurley was a co-founder of the Irish Immigration Reform Movement, which went on to secure thousands of Green Cards for Irish and other European immigrants to the United States. Active in GOP and Conservative Party politics, he is a former candidate for political office in NYC. Patrick Hurley is a 1985 graduate of University College Cork.

Pete King Objects to Islamic Advert Campaign

Congressman Objects to Islamic Ads
Staff Writer, UPI.com
July 22, 2008
NEW YORK, July 22 (UPI) -- A New York congressman has asked the New York City transit agency to drop ads promoting Islam. Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., said that he does not object to the message in the ads, CNN reports. "I have no problem with the ad itself, but I have a very, very real problem with those behind it," King said.
The New York Post reported Monday that one of the backers of the ad campaign is Siraj Wahhaj, the imam of a mosque in Brooklyn. The Post described Wahhaj as a radical because he was listed as a possible co-conspirator in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center and served as a character witness for Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, who was convicted of planning the bombing.
The Islamic Circle of North America has arranged for 1,000 ads to run in Metropolitan Transit Authority subway cars during the holy month of Ramadan, which this year coincides with the month of September. King also found that timing objectionable since it includes the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The ads direct those who see them to visit whyIslam.org for information on the religion.

Monday, July 21, 2008


Why didn't you warn me?
Who'd believe a word out of me?

Orders for the Captain



Plaque Unveiled for Captain James Kelly
Monday, 21 July 2008

A plaque has been unveiled in honour of Captain James Kelly who was acquitted of gun-running in 1970 at the outbreak of the Northern Ireland Troubles. An ageing group of nationalists, known as The 1916-21 Club, erected the memorial in the library in Capt Kelly’s birthplace, Bailieboro, Co Cavan, on Saturday.

The former Irish Army intelligence was at the centre of the arms crisis in the 1970s, which saw Capt Kelly charged, and later cleared by a jury, of illegally importing guns from Germany, allegedly destined for northern nationalists.

Daughter Suzanne, one of Capt Kelly’s 10 children, said the memorial would offer hope to underdogs. “I hope that the people of Bailieboro go to the library and see the plaque,” she said. “For people who are underdogs or people who are wrongly treated, they are able to see this and maybe get some hope.”

Late Taoiseach Charles Haughey and TD Neil Blaney were sacked from the Government after the scandal broke in 1970. State papers released under the 30-year rule revealed statements used in the gun-running trial had been doctored to omit references about informing the Defence Minister of the plot.

After his acquittal, Capt Kelly and his family fought for a public apology and an unequivocal vindication of his good name. Following his death in 2003 aged 74, then-Taoiseach Bertie Ahern declared the Army officer was innocent. The family wants a formal admission that he was wrongly accused and insists their name has been tainted. ”He would go for a job, he’d be there for a couple of days when a message would come through and he’d be asked to leave,” Capt Kelly’s daughter said.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Sarkozy - You Have Three Minutes

Irlandais - Vous Avez Trois Minuits!


http://www.irishtimes.com/

Sarkozy Visit Remains Mired in Controversy
MARK HENNESSY Political Correspondent
French President Nicholas Sarkozy's visit to Dublin tomorrow is still mired in controversy as doubt continues to surround plans to have him meet with Opposition party leaders. The French side agreed to meeting separately with Fine Gael leader, Enda Kenny and Labour Party leader, Eamon Gilmore only after the direct intervention of the Taoiseach Brian Cowen on his return from the United States.


Up to then, the French had wanted the two to meet with Mr Sarkozy in the French Embassy, along with 15 other figures prominent during the Lisbon Treaty campaign, including Declan Ganley and Patricia McKenna.


Tonight a Fine Gael spokesman said the party was satisfied with the outcome. But a Labour Party spokesman said: “The discussions between ourselves and other parties, the French, are ongoing. We would be agreeable to such a meeting but we would have to be assured it would give us a meaningful opportunity to discuss the issues,” he added.

Mr Sarkozy will meet the Opposition leaders on his return from the Embassy and before he holds a press conference alongside Taoiseach Cowen, who is known to be concerned by the damage the visit's arrangements has caused to the Yes side.


During the embassy meeting, No and Yes campaigners will have just 3 minutes to make their case to the French leader, who last week said that the Irish had to vote again on the treaty.

Continue Reading, Click Below:

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2008/0720/breaking32.htm

Re - Elect Jack Meehan AOH President

Ar Aghaidh le Meehan!

Re - Elect Jack Meehan AOH National President
New Orleans National Convention, July 2008


Jack Meehan, the current AOH National President, has been an active Hibernian for nearly 30 years. His home Division is Div #14 in Watertown, Massachusetts. He is the third member of that Division to serve as AOH National President.

Jack has served his Division as President, Vice President, Financial Secretary, Recording Secretary, and as an appointive officer. In 1987, he was appointed to the Massachusetts State Board AOH as Chairman of Freedom for All Ireland. Jack served as Massachusetts State Board President (1993 – 1995), Vice President (1991 – 1993), State Secretary (1989 – 1991), as well as State Chairman of Immigration, High Stakes Drawing, State Convention Co-Chairman, and member of the Massachusetts Major Degree Team.

Jack has served the National Board in many posts including National President (2006 –present), National Vice President (2002-2006), National Treasurer (1998-2002), National Director (1994-1998), National Irish Language Chairman and columnist for the National Hibernian Digest (1990-2000).

At the height of the 1980s illegal Irish immigration crisis, when legal Irish immigration was impossible due to the adverse, discriminatory 1965 Immigration Act, Jack served as AOH National Immigration Chairman. He worked diligently and tirelessly, in conjunction with the IIRM and other activists to effect changes that would bring relief to the illegal Irish. The ultimate result of their efforts was the passage of the Donnelly NP5 and Morrison AA1 Visa programs.

While the thousands of Green Cards brought much needed alleviation at the time, Jack is acutely aware that the 1965 admissions system, still in effect, is an unacceptable de facto "No Irish Need Apply" policy. He is confident that within the context of reforming immigration policy to meet the cultural, economic, intellectual and security interests of the United States, a permanent resolution of the Irish immigration problem can be achieved. Jack will continue to strive in that direction.

Jack represented the National and Massachusetts State Boards of the AOH on the Boston Irish Famine Memorial Committee. Today, the monument erected by the committee stands in a very prominent place on the Freedom Trail as a stark reminder of that horrendous period in Irish American history.

Fiercely proud of his heritage, Jack continually works to preserve Irish culture in our great nation, the United States, that has become home to so many Irish people. He longs to see a united Ireland, Gaelic and free from British military occupation and governmental intervention. This goal, in his view, is non-negotiable. That is his position. He has stood by it and defended it for many years. It will not change.

During his two terms as AOH National Vice President, Jack proposed the establishment of the Holy Cross/Ardoyne Trust Fund to assist fellow AOH member and John F. Kennedy Memorial Medal recipient, Fr. Aidan Troy in his work with cross - community relations and reconciliation in the interface area of Ardoyne, North Belfast. He was proud to serve as the fund's National Board Chairman.

In addition, Jack proposed the establishment and served as National Board Chairman of the AOH's Hurricane Disaster Relief Effort. The AOH's Katrina Fund was of essential assistance to the order's members who had suffered incredibly in the devastating New Orleans natural disaster.

Through Jack's determination and efforts, both funds were among the most successful initiatives ever undertaken by the AOH and LAOH. In testimony to the generosity of the AOH and LAOH, each fund raised in excess of $100,000 for their intended causes.

One of Jack's proudest achievements as National President has been the establishment of the AOH's National Board Veterans Affairs Committee, chaired by member J.J. Kelly, a graduate of West Point and a retired U.S. Army colonel. This committee provides much needed assistance to young men and women returning with life altering injuries from service in Iraq and Afghanistan. It also renders assistance to older veterans. This is a truly noble and essential service to our veterans who have given so much to the citizens of our great nation.



RE-ELECT
Jack Meehan
National President
Ancient Order Of Hibernians In America

Irish American News & Opinion

http://www.irish-american-news-opinion.blogspot.com/


Unequivocally Endorses


The Re-Election


of


Jack Meehan
National President of the AOH




Patrick Hurley
Co - founder IIRM - 1987
NYS AOH Immigration Chairman (1989 - 91)
National AOH Immigration Committee (1989 - 91)
Past President County Cork Association of New York
Ar Aghaidh le Meehan!

Friday, July 18, 2008

Feedback from Readers # 2


On Pete King

I plan to be there. Pete's the best ...true on so many fronts. Looking forward to seeing De Cork Lad. - Irish American leader, Upstate New York


On the Lisbon Treaty

I am not getting flak from the No Vote. The jury is still out on whether or not it was the right decision. I and my team knocked on 5,000 doors during the campaign and the scare mongering was appalling.
But, so be it. We respect the will of the people and we will all work hard to ensure that we benefit from our membership of the EU. Don't believe all those British MEPs. Beidh la eile!

Great craic at Pairc Ui Chaoimh today. The Kerry boys and girls went home sick and sore. Up the rebels!
Hope you and the family are keeping well. Regards to all in NY.

- Fianna Fail Councillor, Cork City


"A province once again!" does not have the same ring to it, some how. - Veteran Irish American Activist, Queens, NYC



You’re absolutely right.
But at least Ireland, unlike other European countries, had the right to a referendum. That’s more that we have here in NYS, where we can’t have a referendum without the State legislature’s approval. They voted against it a few years ago. That’s why we can’t vote on term limits for Albany legislators. -
Irish American Activist, Westchester County





On Declan Ganley and Libertas

There are too many people out there of the belief that Sinn Fein was responsible for the defeat of the Lisbon Treaty.
It was Declan Ganley with his considerable influence and his incredible wealth, a substantial amount of which he poured into the campaign to defeat the Lisbon Treaty, that was the real reason for its defeat. -
Irish American Leader, Massachussetts



Saw him on EWTN late last night -- He was quite impressive.
- Veteran Irish American Activist, Queens County





On the Demise of the Celtic Tiger



Today's Irish Times states the Exchequer is 5.6 billion Euro in the red. Irish Life Permanent has had its shares drop 29% in the past ten days. Their Stock Exchange is doing even worse than the US. But, not to worry. The Irish Government says they are going to take "firm action now." - Veteran Irish American Activist, Washington, DC


T'is going down faster than the Titanic - 1980's Kerry immigrant




On Obama

It is easy to find fault with any political candidate, one of the reason many good people stay away from the spotlight. Politics in the US is fine art. Spin masters abound. You might enjoy this book to see how people are easily fooled. Facts are not always what they seem. - 1980's Cork City immigrant and Wall Street entrepreneur

Irish-Australian Soldier Buried

Irish-Australian member of Australian SAS laid to rest
KIA in Afghanistan
Digger given final salute

Andrew Fraser July 19, 2008
SAS signaller Sean McCarthy lived in many places in his 25 years; yesterday, to the sound of military bagpipes, he was buried in his final resting place. Nearly 1000 people attended the funeral, at the Sacred Heart Catholic Church at Crystal Waters on the Gold Coast, of Signaller McCarthy, who was killed last week by a roadside bomb while he was on patrol in southern Afghanistan.

Earlier, there had been a private family service for Signaller McCarthy, the sixth Australian soldier to be killed while on active duty in Afghanistan. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson attended the funeral. The service, while closed to the media, attracted a wide cross-section of mourners, from Signaller McCarthy's old school friends from Trinity Lutheran College on the Gold Coast to Mr Rudd, who comforted family and friends after the service.

Others to attend the funeral service included Parliamentary Secretary for Defence Support Mike Kelly, a former soldier who served in Iraq, Queensland Deputy Premier Paul Lucas, Vice- Chief of the Defence Forces Lieutenant General David Hurley, and Chief of the Army Lieutenant General Ken Gillespie.

Army chaplain Gary Stone said Signaller McCarthy had "run the race of life well".
"Sean Patrick McCarthy was a loving son, loving brother, loving relative and mate," the chaplain told the service. "You have shown the greatest love a person could show and we salute you."

Wide-ranging tributes from politicians to sportsmen were paid to Signaller McCarthy, the second Australian casualty in Afghanistan this year. The Wallabies, who play South Africa in Perth today, rued the loss of "one of their own" and paid tribute to Signaller McCarthy, an avid rugby supporter. Signaller McCarthy was born in New Zealand but grew up on the Gold Coast, entering the army after he finished school in 2001. But he maintained close links with the Gold Coast as his family still lived there, and he would always look up his old mates when he returned.

In his military career, he served in East Timor and did his first trip to Afghanistan last year before he transferred to the Perth-based Special Air Service Regiment before going to Afghanistan. Signaller McCarthy was awarded the Australian Active Service Medal and the Afghanistan Campaign Medal. After the service, the soldier's coffin was carried from the church by six of his military comrades, and he was finally laid to rest at the Southport Lawn Cemetery.
Australia, one of the United States' staunchest allies.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

How The Irish Defeated Lisbon

No Means No: How Ireland Blocked the European Union's Lisbon Treaty


July 15, 2008

Libertas Leader Declan Ganley speaks in Washington, DC



Watch or Listen to Declan Ganley speak at the Heritage Foundation
in Washington, DC.
This is excellent . . . A must see or hear for all those who care about preserving Irish sovereignty, the concept of the nation state and democracy in Europe!
To view the video click "Watch"
If your computer is not video compatible, click "Streamlining MP3" to Listen




Declan Ganley is the Founder and Leader of the Libertas Institute and
the acknowledged leader of the Irish "NO" Campaign.


More On Lisbon

Ireland Will Vote Again & Get It Right - Sarkozy


Libertas Considering Candidates for Euro Elections


French Eurocrats & Celtic Tiger Gov't Attempt to Stifle NO Campaign


Read Below





Ireland Will Have To Vote Again On Lisbon, says Sarkozy
MARK HENNESSY, LARA MARLOWE Political Correspondents


FRENCH PRESIDENT Nicolas Sarkozy’s declaration that Ireland will have to hold a second referendum on the Lisbon Treaty has caused quiet fury within the Government, just days before he visits Ireland. During a meeting with deputies from his UMP party at his office in Paris yesterday, Mr Sarkozy, according to quotes from a number of those in attendance, said: “The Irish will have to vote again.” The UMP deputies repeated the remarks to journalists waiting outside. On Monday, the French president will travel to Dublin for a five-hour visit and hold meetings with Taoiseach Brian Cowen. He will also meet some of those from the referendum campaign’s Yes and No camps.


Continue reading, click:




Libertas May Contest European Elections
DENIS STAUNTON in Washington


LIBERTAS FOUNDER Declan Ganley has confirmed that the group is raising money across Europe as it considers running candidates throughout the EU in next year's elections to the European Parliament. And if Ireland voted a second time on the Lisbon Treaty, he predicted an even bigger No vote.

Mr Ganley made his comments before news emerged of French President Nicolas Sarkozy's reported view that the Irish electorate would have to vote again on Lisbon.


Continue reading, click:


http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2008/0716/1216073118337.html




Sarkozy 'Forum' With No Side Scrapped
MARK HENNESSY, Political Correspondent

PLANS FOR French president Nicolas Sarkozy to meet in public with anti-Lisbon Treaty campaigners have been scrapped, following last-minute nervousness by the French side.
The French leader will arrive in Dublin on Monday for a five-hour visit which has attracted considerable attention, following his private remarks on Tuesday when he told French MPs that Ireland would have to vote again.

Irish and French officials have met over the last two days to agree an itinerary for the short visit, which is the subject of considerable Irish concern that Mr Sarkozy could make a difficult situation even worse.


Continue reading, click


http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2008/0717/1216073195159.html