Wednesday, June 25, 2008

De Cork Boy's Perspective

De Cork Boy's Perspective
A little late but still great


By Patrick Hurley

"Battman" Returns!

A Micheal, beware the mandarins!


Congratulations to new taoiseach, Offaly man Brian Cowen. We wish the Clara man all the luck in the world as he takes the helm of Ireland, Inc.. He will need it as, by all accounts, the Celtic Tiger is in expeditious demise.

The feline phenomenon was predicated on the input of Brussels largesse, in the form of billions of Euros in EC structural funds, during the 1990s . The southern Irish state had been entitled to the lolly because of its designation as one of the economically undernourished of the European Community. Of course, another essential element of the Irish boom was the old reliable, U.S. corporate investment i.e. inputs from those "evil U.S. imperialists". Though the Celtic Tiger’s politicos and functionaries like to intimate strongly to the contrary, the decade or so of affluence was certainly not as a result of any economic brilliance exhibited by Dublin. All it had to do was to manage and distribute the largesse. Pour billions of Euros into a small country like Ireland and why wouldn’t it boom? In fairness, the bold initiative of visionary Education Minister Donagh O’Malley in the 1960s, in making secondary and third level education widely accessible, ideally positioned the Irish people to successfully exploit the largesse when it came along.

Now that the economic doldrums are once again on the horizon, an increasingly subdued Celtic Tiger is no longer classified as a hardship case. The Brussels largesse is no more. New members from the east have long ago displaced Ireland on the EC dole queque. Long a net beneficiary, as a mature member of the community, the Celtic Tiger is now expected to be a net contributor. This time round there will be no generous handouts to jumpstart the Irish economy. Now the politicos and functionaries will really have to roll up the shirt sleeves and rely soley on native ingenuity and initiative. Reality is slowly permeating the trendy leftie Europhile salons of Dublin 4. The Euro party is well and truly over.

Cowen’s predecessor, Bertie Ahern, has exited on the crest of a wave. Ahern, of course, is the quintessential "northside Dub". However, both his parents were from West Cork. Ahern senior from Kilbrittain and mother from Bantry. Both were active with the West Cork IRA Brigade. In later life, Ahern the elder was a well-known figure to the thousands of clerical students who passed through All Hallows Seminary in Drumcondra, on the northside of Dublin. He was a highly regarded grounds manager at the institution for many years. Ahern the younger has the dubious distinction of having been described by "de Boss" himself, Charlie Haughey, as "the most cunning, the most ruthless, the most devious of them all". Now, that’s an endorsement!

Irish American Corkonians were delighted to learn of the inclusion of two Cork ministers in Taoiseach Cowen’s new cabinet. Batt O’Keefe from Cork Northwest has been named minister for Education. For many years, O’Keefe has been a staunch supporter of the New York County Cork Association. He has been a regular attendee at our functions on "the other side". The word is that "Battman", as he is affectionatley known, is personally close to Cowen.

The Irish American Cork jury is still out on the new Foreign Affairs minister, Michael O Martin, from Cork South Central in "de" city. The feeling is that O Martin has remained very much aloof from Irish American Rebel expatriates. Certainly, he has rebuffed many New York County Cork Association overtures over the years.

A certain humble graduate from West Cork - not looking at anybody, in particular, and certainly not looking into any mirrors - recalls O Martin as the very radical chairman of the Donogh O’Malley Fianna Fail Cumann, in the University College Cork of the early 1980s. Ah, the radicalism and zealousness of youth! There’s nothing like political office and "de" ministerial mercs and perks to knock the anti - establishment edges of "de" boy!

As he assumes his new portfolio, O Martin should be careful not to become envelopped in the reality-averse, desensitizing cocoon spun by Iveagh House - Ireland’s Foggy Bottom - mandarins. Blindly, following the diktats of the "Yes Minister. No Minister. Three bags full Minister. Here’s your script and stick to it, Minister," Foreign Affairs brigade can have adverse repercussions for the aspiring politico. As disparate political characters as "de reel taoiseach" Jack Lynch and "de Boss" Charlie Haughey, quickly grasped the essentiality of bringing the Iveagh House mandarins expeditiously to heel. It remains to be seen whether O Martin will assert himself and stare down the mandarins, or will he be content to vegetate and allow them to call the shots?

As one who is considered potential taoiseach material, O Martin would do well to ponder the fate of his predecessor at Iveagh House, Louth man, Dermot Ahern. Poor Diarmada was demoted to the Justice portfolio in the cabinet re -shuffle. As if following the pied piper, he danced merrily and unquestioningly to the tune composed by the mandarins in collaboration with the extreme leftist group ILIR and assorted anti - American apparatchiks. Thus, did Poor Diarmada aggressively intrude into the domestic affairs of the United States, overtly lobbying for insane debilitating amnesty legislation, which would have been severely detrimental to our cultural, economic and security interests. Adhering verbatim to the mandarins’ reality-challenged script, not only did Poor Diarmada embarass Ireland and the Irish American Community, he also earned a rebuke from the one hundred-member Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus.
One must conclude that Poor Diarmada’s starring role in this mandarin-contrived debacle was a major reason for his political demise. Incredibly, after his embarassing U.S. performance, he was still being touted in some quarters - no doubt by loyalists in deep denial - as a challenger to Cowen for the top job. His demotion signals that that fantasy has well and truly dissipated. So, beware Micheal O Martin! Beware! Aire a mhic! Political misfortune can only befall those promising ambitious ministers who fall under the powerful hypnotic sway of the mandarins.
Ironically, in his new portfolio as minister for Justice, Poor Diarmada will now find himself responsible for enforcing some of the toughest immigration policy in the world - Ireland’s. I mean like . . . poetic justice or what! Irish Americans can only salivate enviously when contemplating Ireland’s commonsensical, no nonsense, hard edged immigration policy. It gives new meaning to the lyrics, "If only we had old Ireland over here!" As the discerning Corkonian will have by now deduced from Poor Diarmada’s surname, Ahern, he is also of Rebel County origin. Father was a schoolteacher from the Coppeen area of West Cork, who navigated his way north to the "Wee County".

Another Soldier of Destiny of the same surname who also did not fare well, in Cowen’s ministerial reshuffle, is Michael Ahern from Cork East. Unfortunately, Michael was demoted to the backbenches from his junior ministerial post.

The current scuttlebutt is that with Batt O’Keefe’s elevation to the cabinet table there are now two Fianna Fail factions in the Rebel County. "Battman’s" brigade is close to Cowen and apparently has the mission of curbing the power and ambitions of O Martin. Then, of course, in O Martin's case, there is Micheal's Mafia championing the good minister and his political interests, which might not always be reconcilable with those of "Battman". T’is a treacherous business, indeed!

As the sage said, "Politics is a fickle mistress!"
Patrick Hurley is a past president of the County Cork Association of New York. In 1987, Hurley was a co-founder of the Irish Immigration Reform Movement, which went on to secure thousands of Green Cards for Irish and other European immigrants to the United States. Active in GOP and Conservative Party politics, he is a former candidate for political office in NYC. Patrick Hurley is a 1985 graduate of University College Cork.

Recession, Job Losses, Renewed Emigration

The Irish Times

ESRI warns of recession, job losses and renewed emigration
PAUL TANSEY, Economics Editor

THE ECONOMY will experience a recession this year for the first time since 1983, and a return to net emigration next year, the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) forecasts in its latest Quarterly Economic Commentary, published today.It anticipates that the economy will contract in size by 0.4 per cent this year after growing by 4.5 per cent in 2007.
This recession reflects a steep decline in domestic demand, according to the ESRI, which calculates that the volume of domestic spending this year will fall by 2.6 per cent. Investment spending is forecast to fall by 14.9 per cent while real consumer spending growth in 2008 has been revised downwards by the ESRI to just 1 per cent from 3 per cent just three months ago.

Shares in Irish companies fell heavily as news of the report leaked into the market. Bank shares were particularly badly hit, with Bank of Ireland down 5 per cent. The ESRI expects economic growth to resume next year, with a forecast expansion rate of 1.9 per cent.
However, this will be insufficient to stem a recurrence of net emigration in 2009. The ESRI projects that the outflow of people from the country will reach 20,000 next year, a level of net emigration not seen since 1990.

The reappearance of net emigration signals a steep deterioration in domestic labour market conditions. The ESRI projects that the level of unemployment will increase by 60,000 or 60 per cent between 2007 and 2009. The unemployment rate - the number out of work as a percentage of the labour force - is expected to climb from 4.5 per cent in 2007 to 6 per cent this year before increasing again to 7.1 per cent in 2009. The numbers at work in the economy next year are forecast to be smaller than in 2007.

Yesterday, the financial services group Hibernian announced plans to move more than 500 jobs to Bangalore in India in the next three years. The recession will also derail the public finances. From an overall budget surplus of €5.2 billion in 2006, the Government is expected to incur a deficit of €7.4 billion in 2009, a turnaround of more than €12.5 billion in the space of three years.
As a result, the Government's overall budget deficit is projected to reach 3.9 per cent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2009. At this level, it would breach the 3 per cent budget deficit limit imposed by the European Union's Stability and Growth Pact. The large budget deficits projected for this year and next would cause the burden of the national debt to increase by almost 10 percentage points. The ESRI reckons that government debt as a percentage of GDP would rise from 25.4 per cent in 2007 to 34.5 per cent in 2009.
Reflecting the recessionary environment, house prices are forecast to decline in both 2008 and 2009.

The ESRI estimates that house prices were overvalued by 12.5 per cent in 2007 and it projects a 6.3 per cent decline in house prices this year followed by a further 1.5 per cent fall in 2009. From the new house price peak in February 2007 to the expected trough early in 2009, the ESRI estimates that new house prices will fall by 17 per cent in money terms and 24 per cent when adjusted for inflation.

However, despite the economy receding into recession, upward pressure on consumer prices remains pronounced. The ESRI has revised its prediction for the rate of consumer price inflation this year to 4.5 per cent from 3.4 per cent three months ago. However, it anticipates that inflation will abate to 3 per cent during 2009.


The Irish Times

The British Defend The Irish People in The EU Parliament

Watch the video and cry!
The British defend Ireland in the European Parliament.
The Irish representatives are nowhere to be seen!
Where are the Fianna Fail and Fine Gael MEPs?
Dev, Collins, Lemass, Tom Barry, Liam Lynch . . . all of the War of Independence generation - both sides! - are turning in their graves.
"Think - what have I got for Ireland? Something she has wanted these past seven hundred years. Will anyone be satisfied . . . Will anyone?" - Michael Collins
It's a sad day for the Irish people everywhere! Our own politicians sell us out!

Aftershock in EU Parliament

Irish Government vs. Irish People

June 20th, 2008

* Taoiseach Brian Cowen and Minister Michael Martin give in to Franco-German and EU Commission pressure to permit the remaining Lisbon ratifications to continue, when they could have stopped these by saying that Ireland cannot and will not ratify the Lisbon Treaty, as the Irish people have rejected it.

* The Irish Government lines up with Brussels against the Irish people rather than stands by the people’s democratic decision of last week to defend it vis-a-vis Brussels - so as to bring about a 26/1 situation by year’s end with which to bludgeon Irish voters in a referendum re-run.

* Talk of “respecting” Ireland’s vote turns out in practice to be a cover for setting out to overturn it in a referendum re-run, with Brian Cowen’s, Michael Martin’s and Dick Roche’s full support - and behind a thick barrier of hypocrisy, spoofing and lies.
Friday 20 June 2008

* These are the three principal lies Irish Government Ministers and the EU people are telling to hide their first steps towards preparing this Lisbon referendum re-run:

* LIE NO.1: That the nine EU States that have not yet ratified Lishon have a “right” to do so irrespective of the Irish No. There is no such right under either EU law or customary international law. Brian Cowen could stop any further ratifications by saying to his EU partners that he respects the Irish No, that because of that there is no question of trying to overturn it by re-running the referendum, and that therefore Lisbon is dead because Ireland cannot ratify it and there is no point any other ratifications continuing, for Lisbon cannot come into force unless all 27 ratify it. British Foreign Secretary David Milliband underlined this point last weekend when he said that it depended on Brian Cowen whether Lisbon was alive or dead.

* LIE No. 2: Minister Dick Roche was up to this usual spoofery on “Morning Ireland” today when he attacked Patricia McKenna for saying that the French and Dutch Governments stopped further ratifications of the EU Constitution in 2005 after their peoples voted No in their referendums. Minister Roche said that Luxembourg held a referendum on this Treaty after the French and Dutch No and in his usual gentlemanly fashion accused Ms McKenna of “telling lies”. In fact, as the Minister is well aware, the Luxembourg referendum was held shortly after the French and Dutch referendums but BEFORE the French and Dutch Governments decided they would not re-run them, and therefore that they could not ratify the Constitutional Treaty - which led the remaining EU States, including Ireland, to abandon further ratifications at that time.

Messrs Cowen, Martin and Roche are spoofing like this, with their EU confreres helping them, to try to cover up the fact that the Irish Government is urging the nine remaining EU States to continue with their ratifications so as to bring about a 26/1 situation which can then be used to pressurise the Irish people to turn their No into a Yes in a second Lisbon referendum.

It is Messrs Cowen, Martin and Roche who are failing to “respect” the Irish people’s No vote by effectively telling the other EU States not to respect it either, but to continue with their ratifications. Why should the other EU States respect last Thursday’s referendum result when the Irish Government does not respect it, but sets out rather to subvert it, as they decided to do even while the voting tallies were being counted on Friday morning last?

Remember Foreign Minister Martin saying at luncthtime on the day of the count that “of course” the remaining ratifications would continue. Remember Commission President Barroso’s at his press conference held before the count was even finished, following a phone chat with Taoiseach Cowen, saying the same thing.

If Messrs Cowen, Martin and Roche had a scintilla of the political courage and statesmanship of the founder of their Party, they would be telling their EU counterparts that they had no alternative but to open up Lisbon and work out a better Treaty for Ireland, for Europe and for a more democratic EU, instead of the supranational EU Federation, with laws made on a population basis, which is what is on offer in Lisbon.

* LIE NO.3: That the other EU States can go ahead with the Lisbon Treaty provisions under the rules for “enhanced cooperation”. The barrack-room lawyers of the Irish media are speaking here. It is the enhanced cooperation rules of the EU Treaties as amended by the Nice Treaty that currently apply. It is nonsense to suggest that the enhanced cooperation provisions of one Treaty, viz. Nice, can be used to bring into force the far wider provisions of another Treaty, viz. Lisbon.

* NB: The number of EU Commissioners must be decided unanimously. Under the current Nice Treaty (Protocol on the enlargement of the EU, Article 4), a reduction in the number of Commissioners to fewer than the number of Member States must be decided unanimously in 2009. Under the Lisbon Treaty(Article 17.5 TEU) the number of Commissioners must be reduced by two-thirds from 2014, “unless the European Council, acting unanimously, decides to alter this number.”

At their next summit meeting in October or December the European Council of Prime Ministers and Presidents will make a “European decision” that when it comes to allocating EU Commissioners in 2014 in the post-Lisbon EU, Ireland and all Member States will be permitted to retain a permanent Commissioner, although in practice there may be senior and junior Commissioners. Because both the Nice and Lisbon Treaties lay down that arrangements for the Commission require unanimity, a commitment on these lines can be given without opening Lisbon.

Taoiseach Cowen will present this as a triumph for Irish diplomacy, while his EU colleagues will smile cynically to themselves. Then various Declarations will be given - to meet Irish concerns on company taxation, human rights, neutrality etc. - which will be tagged on to the Lisbon Treaty, but wll not alter a jot or tittle of its contents.

What threats or implicit threats will be needed to go with these promises? The most obvious one is that Irish voters will be told, as they were not told over the past months - that the Lisbon Treaty aims to establish a constitutionally new Federal Union and that the Irish must decide whether they want to be members of this or not, or do they want to keep the present EU as it stands under the Nice Treaty rules.

The other Member States still cannot ratify Lisbon and establish this new Union without Ireland’s agreement. But the hope will be that this mix of promises and implicit threats will suffice to overturn the Irish people’s No in Lisbon One and turn it into a Yes in Lisbon Two.
A peaceable democratic popular revolt in Ireland and across the EU is needed to prevent this happening and to prevent the anti-democratic Lisbon Treaty-cum EU-Constitution being clamped on most of the peoples of our continent.

- Anthony Coughlan
Anthony Coughlan is the secretary of the National Platform for Ireland and a prominent leader in the "No" campaign.

Monday, June 23, 2008

Tom Rooney for Congress

Tom Rooney for Congress

Please Join
BORGOGNONI & GUTIÉRREZ, LLP
THE WREN GROUP

For a Reception Honoring
TOM ROONEY
Republican Candidate for U.S. Congress
16th Congressional District, Florida

Tuesday, June 24, 2008
5:30 pm – 7:00 pm
BORGOGNONI & GUTIÉRREZ, LLP
GRAND BAY OFFICE PLAZA, SUITE 701
2665 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33133

$500 per person (suggested min. contribution)
Maximum Contribution is $2,300.00 per person
Personal Checks Only.

Please RSVP to Ann Marie Bravo
annmarie@milanostrategies.com or 561-271-9320
Paid for by Rooney for Congress

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Readers' Feed Back

As you can see . . . I forwarded your Peter King Fundraiser Event. I have already sent a donation to his campaign. Keep up your good work.
Irish American leader, Queens, New York




Hey, most of that stuff is wrong. I work in a radio station and I spent most of the week putting together a show on Lisbon. Your 8 points are wrong. The treaty is good for Ireland and good for Munster.

With respect,
Radio Program Producer, Cork City



Congratulations, Pat Hurley. I never even heard of the Lisbon Treaty until you started shouting from the rooftops about it! Reading the NY Post article I see it was more dangerous than I originally thought. You're a tireless worker and this time you beat the odds.
Irish American leader, New York City



Pat,
We have been to Limerick, Cork, and Galway in the past week and everyone we've met is voting NO.
Irish American activist, New York City



The blog is a great idea and the current ‘No vote’ a great subject.
Irish American leader, Philadelphia




Pat:

Tell Your Family & Friends in Ireland - Vote "YES" to Lisbon!
I have to disagree with you on this one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A YES vote is very important for the Irish economy and the Irish nation.
Ireland has done very well from our participation within the EU.
We will have to agree to disagree on this one.
Hope you and all the family and my friends in NY are well.

Up the Rebels!

Fianna Fail Councilor, Cork City



Regarding the Bruton reflection on the negative Lisbon Treaty vote. Surprisingly, and disappointingly, however, in the 23 pages of explanation, I saw nothing of national and cultural (especially religious) identity referred to as playing a role in the NO vote, which it most certainly did. I would love to hear what the former Irish leader and present rep of the EU in Washington has to say about that point!

Irish American religious leader, Virginia

Hi Pat

I won't even attempt to argue with you, as I am a (sceptical) yes voter who waivered before deciding to go the same way as every party in the country bar SF! Except to say that many of the (No) arguments are pure fiction. I worked at the Brussels coalface for a number of years - it just doesn't work the way suggested below and it won't change in the ways suggested either. In fact it's a fairly minor (albeit legally necessary) legal instrument. But let's agree to disagree.

Academic, University College Cork





Thursday, June 19, 2008

Europe's Unhappy Union

From City Journal

18 June 2008


Europe’s Unhappy Union

Political elites continue to push unification against their constituents’ wishes.

By Theodore Dalrymple
"Only the Irish had the guts . . . to hold a referendum on the issue."


Is the European Union heading for a Yugoslavian-style denouement? It sometimes looks as if its political class, oblivious to the wishes or concerns of the EU’s various populations, is determined to bring one about. The French and the Dutch voted against the proposed European Constitution, but that did not deter the intrepid political class from pressing ahead with its plans for a superstate that no one else wants. To bypass the wishes of the people, the politicos reintroduced the constitution as a treaty, to be ratified by parliaments alone. Only the Irish had the guts—or was it the foolhardiness?—to hold a referendum on the issue. Unfortunately, the Irish people got the answer wrong. They voted no, despite their political leaders’ urging that they vote yes. No doubt the people will be given an opportunity in the future—or several opportunities, if necessary—to correct their mistake and get the answer right, after which there will be no more referenda.

The European political class was briefly taken aback. What could explain the Irish obduracy? Several explanations came forth, among them Irish xenophobia and intellectual backwardness and the malign influence of the Murdoch-owned press. The narrowest economic self-interest was also said to have played a part. Having been huge beneficiaries of European largesse over the last 30 years, the Irish—who have the second-highest per capita GDP in Europe after Luxembourg—are now being asked to pay some of it back in the form of subsidies to the new union members from Eastern Europe. Ingrates that they are, they don’t want to pay up, especially now that their own economic growth rate has slowed dramatically in the wake of the financial crisis and the economic future looks uncertain.

Another explanation for the Irish “no” vote was that Irish citizens had been frightened by the proposal of the French finance minister to equalize tax rates throughout Europe, thus destroying unfair competition (all competition is unfair, unless the French win). No prizes for guessing whether the high tax rates of France or the low rates of Ireland would become the new standard. Ireland’s golden goose would find itself well and truly slaughtered in the process.

Not to worry, the European political elites soon recovered from the shock. Ireland, they pointed out, is a small and peripheral country, and not a founder-member of the European Union. Anyway, what does it really matter if referendum after referendum, in Denmark, France, the Netherlands, and Ireland, defeats the proposals of the European political class? The proposals can always be enacted regardless, by other means. What does it matter if two-thirds of Germans regret monetary unification, as do the French and the Italians? What does it matter if prime minister Gordon Brown refused to hold a referendum on the treaty in Britain—having previously promised one—once he realized how roundly voters would reject it? As European Commission president José Manuel Barroso said after the Irish vote: the Lisbon Treaty is not dead, it is living. What the people of Europe want is completely irrelevant.

For the moment, all is peaceful and quiet. The political class, which loves the unitary European state precisely because it so completely escapes democratic or any other oversight (let alone control), and for whom it acts as a giant pension fund, holds the upper hand for now. But tensions and frustrations in Europe have a history of expressing themselves in nasty ways.


Theodore Dalrymple, a physician, is a contributing editor of City Journal and the Dietrich Weismann Fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

The U.S. Should Back Ireland

From The New York Post

THE QUIET REBELLION IN EUROPE
By JOHN O'SULLIVAN

". . . . the US should encourage Ireland to stand firm . . . Up the rebels!"


June 18, 2008 -- IRELAND has stunned the world by voting down the Lisbon "constitutional treaty" intended to give the European Union all the attributes of a sovereign state - without formal statehood or the word "constitution." Experts ask: Why is Ireland, which has greatly benefited from EU membership, so ungrateful? Nonexperts ask: Can anyone make head or tail out of all this? Let's focus on the nonexperts' questions.

What is the European Union?
It's an organization of 27 European states that began as mainly a free-trade area but gradually expanded its activities. Its first big project was the Common Agricultural Policy, which still spends about 40 percent of the EU's total budget on subsidizing farmers. But since the end of the Cold War, it has pursued political integration - a common currency (the euro), foreign policy and governmental institutions in Brussels and Strasbourg that decide about 70 percent of the laws and regulations governing member-states.

So what's the problem?
Until recently, everyone supported European free trade. But many Europeans don't much like political integration: They want to govern themselves. And even the Eurocrats running the show admit that Europe's common institutions have a "democratic deficit" (i.e., are undemocratic and run by unelected bureaucrats.)

Who does want political integration?
Well, the Eurocrats do: They'd get to govern a superstate look-alike with minimum democratic accountability. And the political elites in most member-countries often get the chance to become Eurocrats (with large tax-free salaries and inflation-protected pensions) when the voters throw them out of office at home. Also supporting it are some ordinary voters in those nations with lousy governments (Italy), embarrassing pasts (Germany) and lots of farmers needing subsidies from other countries (France). Most Europeans are bored by all this. A large and growing minority resist it.

Where does the Lisbon Treaty fit here?
Lisbon was the second attempt to fasten onto the EU the straitjacket of a constitution that would make common European institutions the real government of EU states - with national governments acting as their agents - across almost the entire field of politics.

The second attempt?
Yes. The first attempt, frankly called a constitution, was rejected by the voters of France and Holland. Legally, that was supposed to kill the constitution. Instead, member governments made a handful of cosmetic changes to the constitution, called it a treaty instead and declared that it needn't be submitted to the voters. That way, the original French and Dutch referenda could be ignored, and the British government could renege on its pledge to hold a referendum on the "constitution."

Why did the Irish alone get a vote?
First, the Irish constitution required it. Second, the Irish government was convinced that their voters would say "Yes." But the Irish voters decided that it might compromise their independence, democracy and right to the low taxes that are the real explanation of their prosperity. They rebelled - as is their wont - and even the British are cheering.

So that dooms the Lisbon Treaty, right?
Per the law, yes. Per the Eurocrats and their tame governments, no. Ratification will go ahead in 26 other countries; when the Irish are completely isolated, they will either be bullied into voting yes - or perhaps sidelined. But this is a risky business. Other governments - like the Czech one - and many other countries admire what the Irish have done. And forcing nations to vote again and again until they do what the Eurocrats want is getting embarrassing. It looks, well, a little authoritarian.

Is there a compromise available?
Yes, if the Eurocrats and the elites would bend a little. It's called a "variable geometry Europe" (sorry, not my coinage) and it means that different countries could have permanent "opt-outs" from new and existing common European rules. So the Irish wouldn't have to conform to any common taxation rules that come down the line, the British wouldn't join the Euro, etc. But the Eurocrats don't want to bend: They want a grand Euro-state to compete with the United States as a superpower, not a comfortable confederation where the ordinary voter gets to decide who governs him and what laws get passed.
Should Americans give a damn?
Americans signed onto the European Union a long time ago. They wanted a strong partner in world affairs. And they liked the idea of European prosperity based on free trade. But the EU is increasingly anti-American. Its regulatory policy is hostile to the United States.
In practice, Washington gets more real support from strong military powers such as Britain and (yes, even) France than it would from a pacifistic Europe hobbled by disagreements and rivalries and unwilling to spend money on its defense.

So the US should encourage Ireland to stand firm and other Europeans to support them.
Up the rebels!

John O'Sullivan, the executive editor of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, is a former Post editorial-page editor.

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Thank You Ireland!

A relieved German citizen says:
"Thank You Ireland!"


See Jo Conrad's video message

The Economist: Ireland Says 'No'

Ireland's referendum
The answer's no
Jun 13th 2008 DUBLIN
From The Economist print edition

Ireland rejects the EU's Lisbon treaty
AFP


THE European Union has been plunged into chaos after the rejection of its latest treaty by Irish voters. EU leaders must now decide if the Lisbon treaty is dead or can be salvaged in some form—even if the cost is pushing Ireland to the fringes of the European project. Though strongly pro-European, early tallies on Friday June 13th showed Irish voters rejecting the new treaty by a hefty margin. During voting on Thursday, both supporters and opponents complained that they did not understand the highly technical text—many chose to “play safe” and say no.

The Lisbon treaty is complex. It offers sweeping changes to the way the union runs—creating a new full-time “president” to represent member states, and a foreign-policy chief to speak for Europe round the world. It also sweeps away national vetoes in some important areas of policy, such as cross-border policing and justice. Many Irish no voters voiced suspicions that the treaty would, in reality, rob their small state of clout at the EU’s top table.

Nicolas Sarkozy of France and Angela Merkel of Germany are set to issue a joint response as soon as a final result is announced on Friday, calling for leaders to debate a way forwards for Lisbon at a long-planned summit in Brussels next Thursday and Friday. France takes over the rotating presidency of the EU on July 1st for a six-month stint, and is desperate not to lose a carefully planned agenda of projects on things like climate change, immigration and beefing up EU defence co-operation. Both leaders will call for sticking to that French programme: whether that is realistic remains to be seen.

Expect some EU politicians to demand that the Irish vote a second time on the treaty (and this time get their vote “right”). That has been done before: the Irish were asked to vote again after they rejected the Nice treaty in 2001, and obliged with a yes vote the following year. Federalist types will demand to know why a small country on the far-western fringes of Europe, with less than 1% of the EU population, should be allowed to deny Lisbon to 26 other states. Others, including Britain, will continue with their own ratification procedures for Lisbon, but will resist any attempt to “punish” Ireland.

A second Irish referendum would be harder to pull off this time. An economic slowdown after a long boom hung over this week’s referendum. Ireland’s economy will be in still worse shape in a few months’ time, when any second vote might be organised.

More important, the Lisbon treaty’s claims to democratic legitimacy are already threadbare. The Lisbon text is a reworking of an earlier attempt to create a constitution for the EU. That grandiose project was killed off by votes against it in twin referendums in 2005, in France and the Netherlands. It was no accident that Lisbon was a hard text to read: EU leaders were to be heard crowing last year that they had made it “unintelligible” in order to smuggle it past voters. The Lisbon treaty was specifically designed to be passed by the less risky route of parliamentary votes. Unfortunately for its fans, Ireland has to hold referendums on any treaty that amends its constitution. In the end, it was the only country in the block to hold a popular vote on the text.

The yes camp amounted to the entire Irish political establishment: the only parliamentary party to oppose Lisbon was the nationalists of Sinn Fein. Disgusted yes campaigners accused Sinn Fein and a motley collection of other anti-Lisbon groups of spreading lies about the treaty, including claims that it would impose higher taxes on Ireland, force the country to legalise abortion and undermine Irish neutrality. Lies were told, but the big parties waged a terrible, half-hearted campaign. In the face of punchy anti-treaty slogans like “Lisbon: It’ll cost you”, the main messages from the yes camp included such bland generalities as: “Europe: let’s be at the heart of it”.

Ireland now faces a fight to remain at the heart of Europe, amid calls for its marginalisation. That would be outrageous hypocrisy, of course: Ireland only had to vote on the Lisbon treaty because the French and Dutch had already voted no to the constitution. But the EU has been wounded today: do not be surprised if some of its leaders lash out.

AOH Leader Pleads for Irish Priest

IRISH-AMERICAN LEADER PLEADS TO PRESIDENT BUSH
FOR COLUMBAN PRIEST



Quincy, MA & Albany, NY June 17, 2008 - The National President of the nation’s oldest and largest Irish Catholic organization has urged President Bush to remove any threat of deportation of Fr. Cathal Gallagher, a Columban Missionary who has served St Thomas parish in De Smet, South Dakota for 10 years and is seeking Permanent Resident status.
President Jack Meehan stated: “We are not unmindful of the enormous tasks faced by Homeland Security but surely there is no need whatsoever to deport this good man merely because his religious worker visa has expired.”

President Meehan noted the A.O.H’s long support of the Columban Missionary Society and asked President Bush and Michael Chertoff, Secretary for Homeland Security to remove any threat of deportation while the priest's paperwork ---now in its seventh year of processing---is being considered.

“We join the voices of 80,000 Hibernians,” concluded the Irish-
American leader, “with those of Senators Thune and Johnson and the Catholic Legal Immigration Network to grant Fr Gallagher’s petition for Permanent Resident status.”

For more info contact Jack Meehan at 617-285-5113 or Mike Cummings at 518-482-0349



Letter to President Bush


June 16, 2008
Honorable George W. Bush
President of the United States
White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, D. C. 20500


Dear President Bush:



As the leader of the nation’s oldest and largest Irish Catholic organization, I write to you as a matter of urgency regarding the case of Fr. Cathal Gallagher, a member of the Missionary Society of St. Columban.


Fr. Gallagher’s religious worker visa recently expired while in his seventh year of waiting for action on his request for Permanent Resident status. He will be subject to deportation effective July 1 unless his status can be addressed. We urge that any threat of deportation be removed and that Fr. Gallagher’s request for Permanent Resident be granted.

We appreciate that the 9-11 attack has caused considerable upheaval and change in immigration services, not the least of which was the creation of a Homeland Security Department, which has been processing Fr. Gallagher’s request. We also recognize that the illegal/undocumented status of a great many people in the United States is a serious problem with no simple solution and many heartbreaking stories of divided families and life under cover. However, even under those circumstances, we believe that Fr Gallagher’s missionary work overseas and 10 years of service to parishioners in rural South Dakota deserves special consideration and clemency. He has done everything requested of him in terms of documentation and paperwork but the bureaucracy is either too burdened with paperwork or has great difficulty in distinguishing problematic cases with those whose only ‘problem’ has been the ravages of time.

The AOH, whose long association with the Columban Missionary Society extends over a century, wishes to add the voice of its 80,000 members to the pleas of Senators Thune and Johnson of South Dakota and the Catholic Legal Immigration Network for a prompt and favorable decision on Fr. Gallagher’s behalf. We especially will join in prayer with the members of St Thomas in De Smet, South Dakota in the hope that this good man will not suffer deportation.

I would appreciate the favor of an early reply. If there is anything further we might do to help Fr. Gallagher legally remain in the United States, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,


John J. Meehan Jr.
National President
60 Longwood Road
Quincy, Mass. 02169-3925
617-285-5113


Michael J. Cummings
12 Marion Avenue Albany
New York 12203-1814
518-482-0349(h) 518-447-4802(o)

Message From Libertas - Thank You!

The Latest from Libertas
Thank you!
Tuesday, 17 June 2008

Thank you so much for your support and your votes. The battle over Lisbon has been won, the battle for a new Europe continues. We put a lot of time and effort into this campaign, and we'd like to thank all of our supporters, donors, and volunteers for the amazing work that made last Thursday's incredible win possible. In politics, it is easy to simply oppose. We, in Libertas, will now reflect on the message from the Irish people, and begin the process of looking to build a positive alternative to the direction Europe is taking. The price of democracy is constant vigilance, and Libertas will remain on a campaign footing for some time to come, as we await developments in Brussels. We still need your support, your time, and if possible, your money. More information: www.libertas.org
Thank you again,
The Libertas Team

Saturday, June 14, 2008

On the Decisive Irish 'No' to Lisbon


The Lisbon Treaty vote was a "victory of freedom and reason over artificial elitist projects and European bureaucracy . . . The Lisbon treaty project ended today with the decision of the Irish voters and its ratification cannot be continued," - Czech President Vaclav Klaus


The Tories said that after the rejection of the treaty’s forerunner — the now abandoned EU constitution — by French and Dutch voters in 2005, EU leaders should finally accept that their blueprint for reform was dead.

“I think our government should have the courage to say to other European leaders, now we have got to recognise reality . . .
The people of France, the people of Holland voted against a very similar document, the EU constitution. Now the people of Ireland have voted against this . . . It is time to turn away from this whole centralising project and concentrate on things that really matter," - British Conservative Party shadow foreigh secretary, William Hague

Friday, June 13, 2008

Irish Europhiles Refuse to Accept the Democratic Will of the Irish People

'No!' Means 'No!'

The National Platform EU Research and Information Centre
24 Crawford Avenue
Dublin 9
Tel.: 01-8305792 ; Web-site nationalplatform.org

Friday afternoon, 13 June 2008

Foreign Minister Michael Martin and other Irish Euro-federalists are already planning to subvert the Lisbon Treaty referendum result by urging the other EU States to continue with their ratification process instead of telling them that Ireland cannot ratify the Lisbon Treaty as it stands, and that further ratifications elsewhere are therefore pointless, and the Treaty must be reopened.


EU Treaties must be ratified unanimously. Each country ratifies a Treaty on the assumption that all other countries will do so too. If one country says that it cannot ratify a Treaty as it stands - in Ireland’s case because the Irish people have rejected it - there is no point in the other countries proceeding, and the Irish Government should request them to stop.


Taoiseach Brian Cowen now faces a momentous choice. Will he align himself with his own people and respect the Irish people’s vote by telling his EU colleagues that Ireland cannot ratify Lisbon as it stands, and therefore there is no point in the remaining States continuing with their ratifications? Or will be align himself with the other EU States against the Irish people, and urge the former to proceed with their ratifications on the assumption that Ireland will re-run the referendum when everyone else has ratified, as Bertie Ahern did with Nice. For that is the implication of other EU States now proceeding with ratifying the Treaty with the Irish Government’s encouragement.


Mr Bobby McDonagh and the top civil servants in Iveagh House will already be planning a joint response with France and Germany to insist on the ratification process continuing. Foreign Minister Martin’s comments on lunchtime radio today about other countries “of course” continuing with their ratifications, reflects the policy the Iveagh House people will be urging.

The Irish No vote is on a much more substantial turnout than the 35% of Nice One in 2001. The No majority is much stronger. It reflects much wider concern at the way the EU project is going. Representative members of the Irish political class have broken with the predominant uncritical consensus on the Euro-Federalist project - Shane Ross, Declan Ganley, Bruce Arnold, Ben Dunne, Gay Byrne, Ulick McEvaddy, Prof. Ray Kinsella, Gerard Hogan,
This provides Ireland and Europe with an opportunity to take a fundamental look at the EU integration process.


Neither the Irish people nor the peoples of the other EU countries want an EU that is given the constitutional form of a State, as the Lisbon Treaty and the EU Constitiution proposed, even though this issue was not highlighted in the referendum. The peoples of Europe will not tolerate such a fundamental subversion of their national democracy and independence. Even if this federalised EU were to be brought off, it would not be sustainable.

Instead of the “period of reflection” which was supposed to follow the French and Dutch "No" votes in 2005, and which turned out to be an excuse for repackaging the rejected Constitution in the form of the Lisbon Treaty, Europe now needs a period of consultation - with its own peoples, with citizens everywhere - and not just a matter of Brussels talking to Brussels.
The best course now is to return to the aspirations of the Laeken Declaration, which called for democracy, transparency and closeness to the people. The EU Member States should now go back to the drawing-board, for their own sakes, for Ireland’s sake and for Europe’s.


Fundamental to any new Treaty is Lisbon’s population-based voting system which is not acceptable to Ireland or to other smaller States, for it represents a power-grab by the Big States. Each State must retain its national Commissioner, a demand that does not require the opening of the Treaty. Each State must retain the right to decide who its national Commissioner is, instead of that right being altered to a right to make “suggestions” only. Any future new Treaty should contain special Protocols to safeguard Ireland’s position as regards company taxation, public services, fundamental rights or mutual defence commitments. Laws in Brussels should only be made by people who are directly elected to make them, either in the European Parliament or National Parliaments. These are fundamental principles of democracy.

Anthony Coughlan
Secretary

Anthony Coughlan is a prominent leader of the "No" Campaign.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

The Irish People Will Not Be Bullied

Written by Libertas
www.libertas.org
Tuesday, 10 June 2008

The Irish people will not be bullied into voting yes on Thursday, Libertas Chairman Declan Ganley said this afternoon. Mr. Ganley was making his final public comments of the campaign ahead of Thursdays vote, as he launched a billboard truck attacking French president Nicolas Sarkozy for his failure to hold a referendum and the comments of his foreign minister, who threatened the Irish people with "victimisation" if they voted "No".


Mr. Ganley said that the last few days had seen an "Unprecedented" campaign to scare the Irish public.

"The people are being bullied in the most callous and cynical of manners. We are being lied to repeatedly about the consequences of a 'No' vote by politicians who are frankly too lazy to go and get us a better deal. It is high time the Irish people sent the elites both in Dublin and Brussels a very clear message about the kind of Europe we want to see. The French Government have made their intentions very clear. They want to see us ratify Lisbon, and then next month, they will bring forward plans to harmonise taxes, increase our military spending, and interfere in our immigration policy. They have systematically hidden those plans from the Irish people, with the full connivance of our own Government.

President Sarkozy is doing this while refusing his own people a vote on the grounds that they would vote 'No'. We need to send a message to all of Europe that this is not acceptable. A 'No' vote on Thursday is a vote for hope, and a vote for a better future. It is a vote for our right to demand accountability and honesty from our leaders. It is a vote for democracy. I am appealing to all Irish men and women to get out on Thursday, and make it very clear that Ireland needs a better deal than what is on offer in Lisbon. It is time to assert our voice as a nation".


Monday, June 9, 2008

Send Brian Cowen et al Back to Brussels

From: www.libertas.org

Ganley buys one-way tickets to Brussels for Cowen, Kenny and Gilmore
Monday, 09 June 2008


Libertas Chairman Declan Ganley has booked three one-way seats on an 6pm flight to Brussels on June 13th in the names of Enda Kenny, Eamon Gilmore, and Brian Cowen. Mr. Ganley said that he had bought the tickets to make the point that the Irish people should tell the three party leaders to go back for a better deal "and not come back until they have achieved it".

Speaking outside Government Buildings, Mr. Ganley said: "The deal that has been achieved by Ireland in this treaty is an embarrassment. We lose our commissioner for five years at a time, our vote is halved while Germany's is doubled, and we lose vetoes in 60 areas of policy and hand over competence in 105 new areas. We gain an unelected President of Europe. We gain an unelected Foreign Minister. We open back doors in a whole range of policy areas, including taxation. Our veto on WTO deals is pretty much abolished, to the extent that the French now call it a "useful illusion".

We need to send our leaders back to Brussels to get the deal we deserve. Our message to voters is very clear. On Thursday, send Brian back to Brussels, and tell him not to come back without a commissioner. On Friday, he will have both the mandate, and the means, to get a better deal. I'll even pay for their taxi to the airport on Friday evening."

From: www.libertas.org

Friday, June 6, 2008

Eight Reasons to Vote "No" to Lisbon


IRISHMEN AND IRISHWOMEN: In the name of God and of the dead generations from which she receives her old tradition of nationhood, Ireland, through us, summons her children to her flag and strikes for her freedom . . . and, supported by her exiled children in America . . . she strikes in full confidence of victory. - 1916 Proclamation

Vote "No!"
European Community - Lisbon Treaty
Contact your Family and Friends in Ireland
Tell Them
to
Vote "No!" to Lisbon
On June 12

8 Reasons to Vote "No!" to the Lisbon Treaty


1. Creates an unelected President and a Foreign Minister of Europe
The new President and Foreign Minister for Europe will be appointed by the European Council by qualified majority vote. Although many of the terms and conditions of these roles have yet to be decided, they will be committed through the Lisbon Treaty to “drive forward” the agenda of the Council and discussions have already taken place to provide a presidential palace and executive jet for the President.
2. Halves Ireland’s voting weight while doubling Germany’s
The Lisbon Treaty would implement a new system of voting by the European Council which is primarily based on population size. This means that Ireland’s voting weight would be reduced from 2% at present to 0.8% if the Treaty was implemented, while Germany’s would increase from 8% to 17%.
3. Abolishes Ireland’s Commissioner for five years at a time
The Lisbon Treaty proposes to reduce the number of Commissioners to two thirds of the number of member states. This would mean that, on a rotating basis, Ireland would have no seat for five years out of every 15 in the body that has the monopoly on initiating legislation. This would clearly affect a small country like Ireland to a far greater extent than, for example, Germany which is having its voting weight doubled under the Treaty.
4. Opens the door to interference in tax and other key economic interests
Article 113 of the Lisbon Treaty specifically inserts a new obligation on the European Council to act to avoid “distortion of competition” in respect of indirect taxes. The proposals for a common consolidated tax base and the commitment of the French government to pursue it combined with a weakening of Ireland’s voice in Europe through the loss of a permanent Commissioner and halving of its voting weight represent a clear and present danger to our tax competitiveness.
5. Hands over power in 60 areas of decision making to Brussels
The Lisbon Treaty provides for more than 60 areas of decision making from unanimity at present to qualified majority voting. Some of those areas include decision-making on immigration, sport, culture, transport and the appointment of the European President and Foreign Minister.
6. Gives exclusive competence to Brussels over International Trade and Foreign Direct Investment
For the first time, under the Lisbon Treaty foreign direct investment would become an exclusive competence of the EU as part of its common commercial policy. This means that the tools which have been used so successfully by the IDA to attract tens of thousands of jobs to Ireland will become the sole preserve of the European Union and the Irish Government will have to seek permissions.
7. Enshrines EU law as superior to Irish law
On June 12th we will be voting on the 28th amendment to the Irish Constitution which clearly restates the following:
11° No provision of this Constitution invalidates laws enacted, acts done or measures adopted by the State that are necessitated by the obligations of membership of the European Union referred to in subsection 10° of this section, or prevents laws enacted, acts done or measures adopted by the said European Union or by institutions thereof, or by bodies competent under the treaties referred to in this section, from having the force of law in the State.”
8. The Treaty can be changed without another referendum
Article 48 of the Treaty enables changes to be made to it after ratification without the constitutional requirement for another referendum in Ireland. This is confirmed by the independent Referendum Commission on its website which states: there “may” be a requirement for a referendum to implement such changes.

"Public opinion will be led to adopt, without knowing it, the proposals that we dare not present to them directly" ... "All the earlier proposals will be in the new text, but will be hidden and disguised in some way."
- V.Giscard D'Estaing, Le Monde, 14 June 2007, and Sunday Telegraph, 1 July 2007
More Info:

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Irish Examiner (USA) Says 'No' to Lisbon

Editorial From The Irish Examiner (USA)
www.irishexaminerusa.com
Wednesday June 4, 2008

Just Say 'No'

It should not be forgotten, that the process by which the Lisbon Treaty came into being was simply another example of the E.U.'s contempt for the democratic process. In just over a week's time, on June 12th, the Irish will be the only Europeans allowed a vote on the 'new' Lisbon Treaty.

We urge all our readers who are registered and eligible to vote in this referendum to register a 'No' vote.

While membership of the European Union has been an overall benefit for Ireland, this does not mean that accepting further moves towards the federalization of Europe and the removal of more powers from your elected officials in the Dáil, transfering them to unelected bureaucrats in Brussels would be good for Ireland in the longer term.

It should not be forgotten either, that the process by which the Lisbon Treaty came into being was simply another example of the E.U.'s contempt for the democratic process.

After finding themselves with a European Constitution that was rejected by voters in France and the Netherlands, they simply cut-and-pasted the document together in a different format and gave it a nice new, supposedly voter-friendly name - the 'Reform Treaty' - then relied on the national government's unwillingness to risk their voters rejection in the polling booth (the most egrarious example being that of the U.K. where the Labour government promised a referendum in their election manifesto in 2005 and then abandoned their pledge after they were returned to power).

Some will contend that the Lisbon Treaty is not the European Constitution, but they ignore the statements of politicians across Europe. Angela Merkel, the Chancellor of Germany let slip the truth when she said, "The substance of the constitution is preserved. That is a fact."
Or how about Giuliano Amato, the vice-chairman of the convention responsible for drawing up the Constitution in the first place. He was surprisingly honest for an E.U. bureaucrat, saying, "The good thing about not calling it a constitution is that no one can ask for a referendum on it."

If the voters of Ireland - who are in the unique position of being the only peoples in Europe who can stop the ratification - vote 'Yes' next week, then they will begin the biggest transfer of political power from the nation states to the centralised bureaucracy.
If the treaty is ratified, more than 60 areas of national policy will no longer be decided by consensus. Instead a simple majority of nations will set the agenda and policy for all states within Europe.

Presumably these are areas of policy of limited impact? Policies that should rightly be controlled by the new European "super-state"?
Perhaps not though... It may surprise you to know that Ireland would be unable to block policies in areas as diverse as immigration, structural funds, judicial and police co-operation, economic policy guidelines for eurozone members and any initiatives of the new foreign minister and his embassy employees in the new E.U. Embassies that would spring up around the world.

Irish voters have been given a unique opportunity to set the future direction in Europe.
Will you decide to take the road to a undemocratic super state where decisions are taken by unelected committees in Brussels or will you vote for a democratic Europe where you can vote your national leaders out of power if they fail to deliver on their promises?

Monday, June 2, 2008

Vote "No!" to Lisbon


The European Community - Lisbon Treaty
Good for Irish Politicians!
Bad for Ireland!

The Lisbon Treaty will be the death blow to the remnants of Irish sovereignty

The Lisbon Treaty will severely dilute the little influence that Ireland still has over EC decision making

The Lisbon Treaty will further seriously erode the historical relationship between Ireland and the United States

Contact your family and friends in Ireland
Tell Them
to
Vote "No!" to Lisbon
On June 12
No more "selling out" of Irish sovereignty!
A Europe of cooperating nation states. Not a United States of Europe!
More Info: